Archive for April, 2014
Body Scales Fitness Equipment
Without medical purpose no medical device: most dishes have seen it so far, and so an expensive and time-consuming certification as a medical product saves you the manufacturers of devices or substances for examination or modification of the anatomical structure or a physiological process, if these products were not explicitly medical purposes. This could change now by a recent decision of the Federal Supreme Court (BGH).The medical product definition captures also such items and substances which serve the investigation, replacement or change of the anatomical structure or of a physiological process, without pharmacologically. Such influencing of the anatomical structure or physiological processes is not only classic”medical devices as about implants possible. Rather, the question that even fitness or other training devices, devices that identify biometric data with face detection in personal interlock systems and evaluate, or even banal body scales are captured arises. The same applies to certain wellness or cosmetic devices. However, the previous case law tended to read the unwritten feature of a medical purpose in the definition of medical devices.
Only then, if so state the investigation or modification of the anatomical structure or a physiological process for medical purposes in speech, a medical device subject to certification should be accordingly. Otherwise, it required no expensive and lengthy conformity of such equipment. Which is now the Supreme Court (decision of the 07.04.2011, I ZR 53/09) opposed. According to the BGH, targeting a medical purpose is rather just no unwritten construed of the medicine product concept. The European Court of Justice (ECJ), the Supreme Court has submitted this question to the decision, however, has the last word. While he is BGH to recognise that he nevertheless does not necessarily want to, fitness and other training equipment or body scales the medical product law.
On what criteria such devices but then can be separated from the medicine product concept, suggests the Supreme Court only on, without to deliver final criteria. Just for the operators of innovative borderline products in the fitness, wellness and beauty area, which previously were allowed to imagine themselves due to lack of medical purpose outside of the medical product law, it could be so closely, if the Court follows the opinion of the BGH. Even though until then, it will take some time, also some Court of first instance in the case of competition disputes could now Invert on the line of the BGH and take the marketability of units without proper marking. The market for health products threatens to once again close. Other non-binding and free information related to the medical product law, see
Pages
Archives
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- November 2023
- June 2023
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- December 2019
- October 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2018
- April 2018
- December 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- April 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- October 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- April 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010